
An ETF held within a life insurance policy functions as a unit of account (UA) among the policy’s other investment vehicles, with no guarantee of performance.
In a multi-asset life insurance policy, an ETF is listed as one of several investment options (along with stocks, bonds, and real estate investment trusts). It functions like any traditional ETF (index tracking, passive management, low fees), but it is held by the insurer on behalf of the policyholder within the policy’s tax-advantaged framework.
Access to ETFs depends directly on the structure of the contract:
The PEA is the most tax-advantaged investment vehicle for European stocks and ETFs, but its scope is limited: only funds that invest at least 75% in securities from the European Union are eligible, which excludes a large portion of physically replicated global ETFs.
Life insurance, on the other hand, provides access to a global market with no geographic restrictions, featuring equity, bond, and sector-specific ETFs from all regions.
The PEA caps contributions at €150,000 (€225,000 for a PEA-PME), whereas life insurance has no cap.
On the tax front, a recent change warrants attention: the 2026 Social Security Finance Act has created a discrepancy between the two budgets. Social security contributions on PEA accounts have risen to 18.6%, while those on life insurance policies have remained at 17.2%. Life insurance now has a clear tax advantage in this regard, whereas the two tax brackets had been aligned until now.
Investing in ETFs through a life insurance policy involves two levels of fees:
For example, an Amundi Core MSCI World ETF with an internal expense ratio of 0.12%, held in an account that charges a 0.30% unit fee, results in a total cost of 0.42% per year. The same ETF in an account that charges a 0.50% unit fee comes to 0.62% (source).
This difference, which may seem small at first glance, grows significantly over time. For an initial investment of €20,000 yielding a 6% gross annual return over 20 years, a 1.2-point difference in fees results in a difference of nearly €9,000 at the end of the period.
The choice depends on the investment universe offered by the contract, which varies significantly from one insurer to another. The most commonly included ETFs include a global ETF (MSCI World or ACWI), an S&P 500 ETF for exposure to the U.S. market, and possibly an emerging markets ETF as a supplement.
Three selection criteria take precedence:
One thing to keep in mind: the ETFs listed vary by policy, and even an ETF mentioned in a guide may have been removed from a particular insurer’s offerings. It is therefore important to check the updated list of available investment options before making any decisions.
Raizers provides access to a selection of ETFs within Generali’s open-architecture life insurance policy, chosen based on quality criteria (fees, assets under management, tracking accuracy) rather than an exhaustive catalog that would be difficult to evaluate on one’s own.
Educational content to help you invest more effectively, on your own.
Investing in an ETF through an investment contract involves two types of fees: the contract’s management fee applied to the investment units (0.30% to 0.60%) and the fund’s own internal fees (0.05% to 0.40%). Total fees thus range from 0.40% to over 1% per year—a seemingly small difference, but one that can reduce the final principal by several thousand euros over the long term.
Life insurance offers a global investment universe with no geographic restrictions or contribution limits, unlike the PEA, which limits direct access to European securities and caps contributions at €150,000. Furthermore, since the 2026 Social Security Financing Act (LFSS), social security contributions for life insurance have remained at 17.2%, giving it a direct tax advantage over the PEA, for which the rate has risen to 18.6%.
In a multi-asset life insurance policy, an ETF (or tracker) is held in the form of a unit of account (UA). It allows for passive investing at a lower cost, while taking advantage of the policy’s tax framework. Access to these investment vehicles depends directly on the type of policy: Open architecture: offers a wide selection from among dozens or even hundreds of ETFs from various asset management firms. Closed architecture: limits the choice to only the financial institution’s in-house funds.
Discover all the essential resources you need to master the art of investing.
More than 50,000 customers trust us. Here's why.